Netflix SWOT Essay - 1331 Words

Can you name the largest online entertainment subscription service? If you said â€Å"Netflix† then you are correct. Netflix started in 1997 by Reed Hastings and the subscription service started in 1999. The company headquarters is based out of San Francisco, California. There are over 100 shipping location in the United States. Netflix offers over 100,000 DVD titles and over 8,000 that are ready to be watched instantly on a subscribers PC. Netflix has over 1500 fulltime and 1100 part time employees at their headquarters and shipping centers. This had made Netflix the top ranked e-commerce company in customer satisfaction and that is causing a rapid growth in subscribers, revenue and earnings. How does it work? First, sign up create†¦show more content†¦Netflix has been named the #1 retail Web site for customer satisfaction for six consecutive surveys since 2005 by ForeSee Results. In the fall of 2005, Fast Company named Netflix the winner of its annual Customers First Award. In January 2007, Netflix was named the Retail Innovator of the Year by the National Retail Federation. (www.netflix.com) According to Netflix most recent SEC 10K report here is Netflix’s core strategy and marketing strategy: Our core strategy is to grow a large DVD subscription business and to expand into Internet-based delivery of content as that market develops. We believe that the DVD format, along with its high definition successor formats, including Blu-ray will continue to be the main vehicle for watching content in the home for the foreseeable future and that by growing a large DVD subscription business; we will be well positioned to transition our subscribers and our business to Internet-based delivery of content. In January 2007, we introduced our instant-watching feature for PCs. We intend to broaden the distribution capability of our instant-watching feature to other platforms and partners over time. In January 2008, we announced a development arrangement with LG Electronics. While the terms of this arrangement have not been finalized, we anticipate developing, in conjunction with LG Electronics and other consumer electronics’ manufacturers, a set-top box device or other devicesShow MoreRelatedSwot Analysis : Netflix 1560 Words   |  7 PagesSWOT Analysis A SWOT analysis is a framework designed to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of an individual firm. This framework focuses on both external factors, opportunities and threats, affecting the company as well as internal resources, strengths and weaknesses, the firm can leverage. It is important to note that SWOT poses some weaknesses, and is a simple, snapshot tool for analyzing companies that are incredibly complex, and ever changing (Cook, 2015). StrengthsRead MoreA SWOT Analysis of Netflix861 Words   |  3 PagesNetflix is on online television streaming service that allows its subscribers to watch unlimited, available movies and television series for a low-price monthly rate. Netflix is currently available in over 40 countries. It is located mainly Latin America, and is looking to expand into Europe. Emerging into the European market will offer Netflix much more market share. It was recorded in 2013 that Western Europe had 134 million broadband homes as opposed to the U.S. with 88 million. The article refersRead MoreSwot Analysis Of Netflix1053 Words   |  5 PagesNetflix is an American entertainment company that was founded in 1997. Their main business comes in the online form, by streaming television shows and movies online. The company was founded by Marc Randolph and Reed Hastings. As of this July, Netflix had nearly 104 million subscribers worldwide, and only half of those coming from the United States. Netflix has some very unique qualities when it comes to social responsibility. Towards their employees, they allow unlimited vacation time, which is unheardRead MoreSwot Analysis of Netflix1128 Words   |  5 PagesSWOT analysis for Netflix: Strengths: 1. Proprietary technology. Netflix has proprietary technology system to stream TV shows and movies and also including processing delivery and return DVDs. This specific system makes the business in Netflix more efficiency. 2. Goodwill and brand value. Netflix is a company with reputation. It has 15 years experiences and has a good deal of loyal consumers. 3. Competitive price. The service is in expensive in Netflix. It just cost 8 dollar perRead MoreSwot Analysis of Netflix1144 Words   |  5 PagesSWOT analysis for Netflix: Strengths: 1. Proprietary technology. Netflix has proprietary technology system to stream TV shows and movies and also including processing delivery and return DVDs. This specific system makes the business in Netflix more efficiency. 2. Goodwill and brand value. Netflix is a company with reputation. It has 15 years experiences and has a good deal of loyal consumers. 3. Competitive price. The service is in expensive in Netflix. It just cost 8 dollar perRead MoreSwot Analysis Of Netflix1267 Words   |  6 PagesSWOT ANALYSIS: Strengths: †¢ Netflix is the largest online entertainment subscription service in the United States, and it accounts for a third of all U.S. internet traffic. †¢ Netflix has created resilient brand recognition. It is very well known among Internet users, and accounts for about thirty per cent of daily Internet traffic. †¢ Largest streaming library among competitors with award winning original content like the series House of Cards, and Hemlock Grove. †¢ Low monthly subscription feesRead MoreNetflix : A Swot Analysis1369 Words   |  6 Pages In conducting a SWOT analysis of Netflix, we must not only look at the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, but we must also draw conclusions about Netflix’s particular situation and how these four areas can be used to improve its overall strategy. In terms of Netflix’s strengths, it has potential internal strengths and competitive capabilities in its strong brand-name image and reputation. Netflix has become a household name with over 75 million subscribers in over 190 countriesRead MoreSwot Analysis Of Netflix1060 Words   |  5 PagesNetflix This paper is broken down by layouts that will show how Netflix has strategic planning and overall objectives on how they value their customers, but look for a profitable outcome. The plan of this layout is to help describe Netflix’s mission statement, business model, competitive advantage, and their financial and strategic objectives (Gamble, J., Thompson, A.A., Peteraf, M.A., 2006). Mission and Vision Statement According to How Does Netflix Work?, (n.d), Netflix does not have an officialRead MoreSwot Analysis Of Netflix954 Words   |  4 PagesNetflix was founded in 1997 on a platform that offered video rental by mail. Reed Hastings, the CEO, co-founded Netflix when he decided that he was sick of paying late fees from Blockbuster. Being a subscriber of Netflix at this time meant that you were able to order a video with one day delivery with no hassles of late fees. In 2007, Netflix expanded by providing online streaming of media such as TV shows and movies, while still providing their DVD by mail services which was what they were originallyRead MoreSwot Analysis Of Netflix1318 Words   |  6 PagesThe biggest weaknesses in Netflix was it’s marketing strategies, pricing, and average brand image presence. It met a lot of challenges in the Indian market. They had problems lack of local content and research of what the consumers wanted and no local content. Only 7% of Netflix was tailored to the Indian market. It’s similar to trying to market an American product in an Indian market. The prices were considered luxury prices and because of the lack in brand image a lot of Indian consumer would stay

By Jove A Brief Look at Polytheistic Divine Command Theory

Sophocles’ famous play â€Å"Antigone† highlights a problem in what was then the prevalent worldview for most pious Greeks, that of Divine Command Theory. Divine Command Theory is a philosophical paradigm, or worldview, which essentially states that an action is good if and only if it has been commanded by a divine entity, which, to quote St. Thomas Aquinas, â€Å"all men know as God.† The problem arises in what happens when there exist multiple deities, such as is the case with the Greek and Roman pantheons. Socrates himself argues about this in the famous work Euthyphro, underscoring the fact that this is a problem which has been around for a very long time. It would seem that the existence of multiple deities destroys the possibility of there being a coherent system of morality. What, for example, would be the course of action if one god were to prefer one action which is opposed to another action preferred by a different god? In the Greek mythology which serv es as something of a backdrop for Antigone, it was not at all uncommon for the Olympian deities to be at odds with each other about this or that thing, or even outright conflict. Another problem raised by a polytheistic Divine Command Theory is the question â€Å"Do the gods command an action because it’s morally right, or is it morally right because the gods command it?† The polytheists must by necessity choose the first option, for reasons that will be explained later in the paper. This paper will take the position that the

Corporations Law Moot Attacking Side

Question: Discuss about the Corporations Law for Moot Attacking Side. Answer: Introduction: Whether there has been a breach of constitution by the company by borrowing funds from an overseas financial institution? Whether there has been a proper amending of the constitution to be able to go ahead with the business of casino and borrowing of funds from overseas financial institutions? Whether there has been an oppressive conduct towards Hilary in the given situation. Relevant Law The replaceable rules and the constitution forms contract terms between the parties mentioned below (Woodward Bird, 2005) as mentioned in section 140 of the Constitution Act 2001 ("CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 140Effect of constitution and replaceable rules", 2016): Between each member and the company Between the directors and secretaries and the company; and Between each member with the other member. In the case of Hickman v. Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders Association (1915), the facts were such that it was provided by the internal rules of the association that any dispute that would be there between the member and the company would be required to be solved by the way of arbitration (Hickman v. Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders Association, 1915). The dispute was taken to court by Hickman. The court opined the it was forced for Hickman to be complying with the rules of internal governance as the contract was binding between Hickman as the member and the association. The members can enforce in their capacity. In the case of Rayfields v Hands the directors were required under the Articles to buy at a fair value the shares of the members (Rayfields v. Hands, 1960). It was opined by the court that this could be enforced by the members against the directors who were also a class of members. The qualification shares had to be taken by the Director. In the case of McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Ltd. if a breach could be showed by the member that the breach of the constitution had caused a loss to be suffered and which was not a loss that the company had suffered, it was then possible that damages can be received (McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Ltd., 2010). An amendment in the resolution can be brought through special resolution. There may be modification or repealing of the companys constitution by a shareholders special resolution. A special resolution is a resolution when the same is passed by a majority which is not less than 3/4th of the members who are entitled to vote and who are voting in person or in the case where there are proxies which are allowed then through proxies ("Companies Act 1961 - SECT 144Special resolutions", 2016). Further there is also a notice that is required of twenty one day which is to be given which states specifically the intention to propose that the resolution is a special resolution. Thus a special resolution would require atleast 75% of the votes. A dispute will always be there between the companies member and between the management and the members. The minor shareholders in major conflict, especially in closely held, small, private companies where shares are in the hands of few people are vulnerable before the majority. The majority shareholders are able to look at their own benefits. The boards composition can be dictated by it and indirectly the policy of management. If numerous enough, resolutions can be passed by them thereby changing the companys constitution. The matters of oppression are generally very controversial in nature, especially in companies that are closely held. The realities in a company is that the majority decisions are the on which are prevailing usually and the decision making is usually in the hands of the majority of the company. It is not necessary that every complaint which is made should unduly preoccupy the management and inhibit the companys objects proper pursuit (Re Anti-Corrosive Treatment Ltd , 1980). In the case of Foss v Harbottle (Foss v Harbottle, 1843) the concept of majority ratification that is concept which is rough and ready and deals with acts of the management that are wrongful. Challenging of managerial wrongs is often very difficult and obtaining justice in such cases may be difficult. In the case of the philatelist who was 88 years old and who was holding the voting control and who was ignoring the companys procedures finer points, was on the board contemptuous, having told the prospective employees that one of the sons/directors was not right in the head and overrode his two sons persistently who were the majority shareholder beneficiaries. The Corporations Act 2001, Sections 232 and 234 allow that oppression applications be made by the shareholders or shareholders who are formerly part of the company or even people who ASIC has determined will be entitled for doing the same. If there is an application which has been made then the courts would be required to find out that the companies conduct of affairs is oppressive due to the reason that it is contrary to the shareholders interest either as a whole or prejudicial, oppressive or discriminatory unfairly against either a shareholders group or a particular shareholder. The companys affairs terms are defined are very wide and refers basically to anything which the management is involved in and the companys operation and its affairs. The oppression would basically involve the diversion of the opportunities of the corporate, remuneration that is excessive, share issues manipulation, boardroom tactics, withholding of information or company funds misappropriation. Application A constitution and internal rule is a contract between the members and the company. There has been a breach of the constitution and internal rules which provided the company to deal with residential apartments in Sydney, Melbourne or other capital cities for sale. Further it also mentioned that borrowings could only be done with the Australian Financial Institutions. As held in the Hickman case if it is mentioned that borrowings can be done only through Australian Financial institution it would be a breach if the same is not complied with. Thus by borrowing funds from Overseas Financial Institution there has been a breach of the internal rules and the constitution of the company. This further led to there being a breach in the contract that formed under section 140 of the Constitution Act 2001, wherein the contracts formed through the companys constitution. The Directors shall be held responsible for the same as in the Rayfields case. Further if a member can show that the damage that has been caused is a damage which is other than that which has been caused to the company than there may be damages that can be received. The members will be able to enforce in their capacity the internal rules and constitution. Further, in the given situation if there was a requirement for borrowing from an overseas funding company and also entering into the business of casino where the same has not been mentioned in the constitution of the company and it specifically states that the company will be involved only with residential apartments it would be required that the constitution of the company should be amended by at least 75% of the votes. However, here only Bernie and Little Marco have gone ahead with the activities which are not in line with the constitution of the company thus being in breach of the same. It can be stated that the acts of the directors to go ahead with the business of casino in Las Vegas without considering the nuances of the constitution of the company and the fact that Hilary in a weaker position as compared to Donald thereby he got the majority support there is a likely situation of minority oppression wherein the views of Hilary are her benefit in the company are not considered. There has been an act of misconduct and oppression by the remaining directors as they have gone ahead with the casino business and obtaining funds from the overseas financial institution without informing Hilary giving the excuse that they did not want a heated conversation. This has lead to the misappropriation and loss of funds of the corporation. Conclusion There has been a breach of the internal rules and constitution by the Directors when the funds were borrowed from overseas financial institution, since the constitution and internal rules clearly state that it is only through Australian financial institutions that the funds are to be borrowed. There was no special resolution that the company had passed for going ahead with an activity that was against the constitution and internal rules of the company, as under the Corporations Act is requires that there should be at least 75% which not availed before going ahead with the business strategy. Further, there has also been an act of oppression against Hilary, as the business of casino and borrowing of funds was done without making it known to her despite knowing that she was not in the favor of such a business. Also this business led to there being a misappropriation of funds. It can be stated conclusively that the legal position of the Director is weak for breaching the constitution and the internal rules of the corporation and there will be an action that will lie against the directors for the said breach (Ciro Symes, 2012). Further also there has been a breach on the part of the Directors for not availing the requisite resolution for the amendment of the constitution. Also an act of oppression has been made against Hilary by the remaining directors. References Ciro, T. Symes, C. (2012).Corporations law. Pyrmont, N.S.W.: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. Corporations act 2001 - SECT 140Effect of constitution and replaceable rules. (2016). Austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 7 September 2016, from https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s140.html Companies Act 1961 - SECT 144Special resolutions. (2016). Austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 7 September 2016, from https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/repealed_act/ca1961107/s144.html Foss v Harbottle, 67 ER 189 (1843). Hickman v. Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders Association, 1 Ch 881 (1915). McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Ltd. (2010). Rayfields v Hands, Ch 1 (1960). Re Anti-Corrosive Treatment Ltd, ACLC 34,165 (1980). Woodward, S. Bird, H. (2005).Corporations law. Pyrmont, NSW: Lawbook Co.

Anna Garcia Lab Report free essay sample

Anna Garcia was found dead in her entry hall way by the police at 9:56 am on the notice from Doug Greene who was worried and called 911 at 9:45 am. The suspects were/are Alex Garcia, Erica Piedmont, Doug Greene, and Lucy Leffingwell. The evidence supports the case of it being none of them. I have received the suspect list, external autopsy report, and other evidence collected. So far the internal autopsy is needed to confirm any hypotheses and now all thoughts of how Anna Garcia died is only a hypothesis. Summary of Findings: Anna Garcia was found dead at 9:56 am by local police. My findings are that none of the suspects committed any crime related to Anna Garcia’s death. In support of this, the finger prints, blood analyses, shoe print, hair, and was unknown substance/Aspirin all show that none belonged to anyone but Anna. I believe that a disease or some other foreign pathogen caused her death, the thing that killed her I belief is Reye’s syndrome. We will write a custom essay sample on Anna Garcia Lab Report or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page To support this it is caused by aspirin and when recovering from an illness. It also causes vomiting (was on corpse), irritability and aggression (was reported she was in arguments and fighting with many people), and causes edema (on corpse in ankles). Her body also had a injury on her head were she is thought to have fallen and hit her head, I suspect on the over turned table in the crime scene. Conclusion: In all the findings support Reyes syndrome. The findings are her; blood tests, suspect stories, and fair amounts of information that suggest no person was involved all support that the manner of her death was natural, and not foul play for anyone to get ahead.